Judgebusters on a MissionI'm Back!!! Newest Story - - - -Dr. Richard FineWhy Andrew Martinez DiedGregory Johnson Jr. Death's Was Not a SuicideCont. Gregory Johnson Jr.Judge James Ware "Why I dislike him"U.S. District Court Case No. 5:08-cr-00938 USA vs Harmon9/11 BuildingWhat.com GeraldoConcentration CampsUpdate Ex-Attorney Jamie Harmon AKA Jamie Harley ScandalComing Soon Documentary How Bad is Bad California's Judicial SystemPropublica.org California's Nurse Care ScandalWhat's Up Judge Edward Lee Make Up Your MindHOT OF THE PRESS READ Keith Olbermann Judge Manley Ethical ViolationsAsylum SeekersPat Tillman P4 "TOP SECRET"Jamie Harley State Bar OpinionJohn Mark Karr LA OrderJamie Harley Mercury NewsDon't Vote For Our JudgesUS Nuremberg ViolationsLouisiana Judicial CrisisJudges DeAnn Salcido, Marilyn Milian, Stephen Manley All Have in Common ? National ExposureACLU Please InvestigateLawless Mental Health CourtLindsay Lohan Habeas CorpusDA Misconduct County Jail is the ProblemJudges Failed In Misconduct StudyEspinoza Unclean HandsPolanski v. EspinozaPolanski V. Judges in LARoman Polanski LA FileRoman Polanski LA CourtGAG Order ColoradoJudgebusters CartoonsJudgebusters T-ShirtsJudge Stephen ManleySART - Momentum HealthFederal Judge James WareMemorial "Andrew Martinez" "The Naked Guy"JD Journal John Mark KarrImpeach Federal Judgeswww.harmonlegal.com "BUSTED"Hells Angel Motor Club San Jose CaliforniaJFK Secret Society SpeechFederal Update 5:08-cr-00938-JW USA v. HarmonSantaClaraCounty.gov downloading my websiteHarmon Harley Federal Case Juror TranscriptMust Read Jamie HarmonGetting Final JusticeSentenced to SilenceJamie Harley Suspension Date Sept 10 2010Jamie Harley AKA Harmon Files Appeal Ca Supreme Court "FALSE"Zyprexa Anti-Psychotics Slow Evil DeathBlessing Being A MessengerJamie Harmon AKA Harley Ted StalcupCode of Judicial ConductJamie Harmon AKA Jamie Harley Attorney At Law Case #: _CR-08-0938 JWState Bar Decision QuestionableGlobal Judicial Corruption ReportDisclaimerFair Use NoticeContact Us

There is a huge conspiracy behind this photo.. 

Navy Conspiracy...

With the help of Moffett News, the newspaper that was written by the Department of the Navy Public Affairs officer for Naval Air Station Moffett Field, California, I will be able to show you an exact time line of events that transpired in 1988 regarding Captain Dan Speed.

Captain Skip Moyer III covered this all up with the help of several admirals in the United States Navy at that time. I will be showing you their photos as well.

My life as been a living hell because of the Department of the Navy. As you can read in the sworn declarations surrounding Captain Dan Speed's photo below, Captain Speed had a history of being a "womanizer." Only one person in the whole United States Navy came forward to help me.  His name is Captain Gregory Bushnell.With the help of Captain Bushnell's statement, others within the Department of the Navy can be implicated.  Maybe because of my case, I helped Lt. Paula Coughlin. I would like to think so. My case was already known within the Department of the Navy. 

Because the Department of the Navy did not want any of this information to be public, I have been constantly harassed for years.

Why am I coming forward now, because my son has been a victim of their harassment. What the government has done is unthinkable. 

I will be posting my original statements to the Department of the Navy. As you can see I was very calm about the matter but the Navy treated me like a "dog."  I have determined that the reason this never became public was because of the President of the United States at that time i.e. George W. Bush, Sr.  

In addition, every attorney I hired took my money in the thousands of dollars and did nothing.  I had a huge case. Why would attorneys not do the proper thing??

I believe in my heart that our government is overly powerful to such a degree that it is criminal in nature.

Captain Skip Moyer had a violent temper.  Prior to my accusations against Captain Speed, another naval officer at our command had accused Captain Speed of harassing a woman at a fun run.  I believe these allegations to be true.  I became extremely frightened when I found out that a Captain in the United States Navy could literally cover-up a crime.  Was it because he was a Naval Academy graduated??? The story thickens here which is why I have always had to live in fear. 

In addition, the Department of the Navy improperly separated me in 1996 with I believe with the help of Senator Barbara Boxer that is why I want to write my story. There is a law put into place called the "constructive service" doctrine.  Please look it up.  First I went to the United States Court of Federal Claims where I should have been heard. I was not. What bothered me is that at the same time I was fighting my case another officer was fighting his case.  His case was directly against  ex-President George W. Bush.  What bothered me is that the man died in supposedly a helicopter plain crash so he never got to finish his case against Bush Sr. What I noticed in the Court of Claims I was being harassed and my file tampered with.  But to get on with why I am still in the United States Navy even though the Court of Claims committed the following against me:


              

The Court of Claims refused to apply the doctrine of harmless error.  Noting that the “defective composition” of the original selection boards, id. at 993, was “directly related to the purpose and functioning of selection boards,” id. at 994, and violated the reserve officers’ “rights to fair procedure or process,” the court concluded that “the doctrine of harmless error cannot be applied to this type of procedural error.”  Id. at. 996.

 

 Under that doctrine, military personnel who have been illegally or improperly separated from service are deemed to have continued in active service until their legal separation.  Clackum v. United States, 296 F.2d 226, 229 (Ct. Cl. 1961

 

 

Alberta Jones



webassets/president.JPG

 
   





CAPTAIN DAN SPEED, US NAVY

webassets/Speed.JPG

diamondstatementgoodcopy.JPG

webassets/CaptainBushnelldeclarationjpg.jpg

CaptainBushnelldeclarationpage2a.jpg

              

The Court of Claims refused to apply the doctrine of harmless error.  Noting that the “defective composition” of the original selection boards, id. at 993, was “directly related to the purpose and functioning of selection boards,” id. at 994, and violated the reserve officers’ “rights to fair procedure or process,” the court concluded that “the doctrine of harmless error cannot be applied to this type of procedural error.”  Id. at. 996.

 

 Under that doctrine, military personnel who have been illegally or improperly separated from service are deemed to have continued in active service until their legal separation.  Clackum v. United States, 296 F.2d 226, 229 (Ct. Cl. 1961